Dopo la sentenza che ha condannato Khodorkovskj a un’infinità di anni in galera per unico volere, autoritario e irremovibile, Putin's Gazprom may now give vent to his innermost desires and seeks to expand its markets. There are two works that intend to build: the first in Ukraine and Bangladesh in the second. It must be said that Gazprom was already working in Ukraine and already earned, especially after Yanukovych, Ukrainian prime minister, and Medvedev, Russian Prime Minister, reached agreement on the Crimea, Russia gave a discount on the cost of gas to Ukraine allowed 'Russian army to remain in Crimea until 2042. Now that Ukraine does not know how to modernize its pipelines seeking help from Moscow and Medvedev imposes itself: it imposes a 50% increase (and I'm not wrong to put a 0 in most is a rise half the price) on gas bills and replied that the work can only play if Ukraine would agree to give full rights to the pipeline. The request, as well as peremptory and dictatorial, can build a plan B is not insignificant: the agreement Gazprom ENI (the one you mentioned also Wikileaks) for the construction of a pipeline that could supply Western Europe without pass from Ukraine. In short, Russia has been able to play so well that its weapons can now do what it wants and ask what he wants to Ukraine, which, by now, any choice will lose face only.
Based on this policy comes the second project, one in Bangladesh, where Gazprom is preparing and drill at least ten gas wells on behalf of the state. There are some questions to clarify: First, poverty in Bangladesh, children are malnourished, the marginal areas are vast, the infant mortality rate in the same amounts to 138%, child prostitution is, by now, the basic foundation of the existence of many population, the second thing the government's inability to be able to exploit the vast riches of the territory. This scenario can not but lead, with the passage of time, have seen a script, the one just described with Ukraine.
Because Gazprom has become so powerful? For two specific reasons: 1. Forced removal of all competitors to obtain a monopoly 2. choice of working in politically weak countries and obviously poor and backward in order to impose its will then no possibility of debate.
Alexei
0 comments:
Post a Comment